3 ms·
I was able to build it and a lot of it seemed to work There was some debugging thing where it embeds debug info using module level assembly that you have to di
by pizlonator 4mo ago
I was able to build it and a lot of it seemed to work
There was some debugging thing where it embeds debug info using module level assembly that you have to disable.
- dataflow 4mo agoThanks! If you don't mind a suggestion: I would probably list it in [1], given how many programs depend on it. [1] https://fil-c.org/programs_that_work https://fil-c.org/programs_that_work
- pizlonator 4mo agoIt’s not inline assembly It’s module assembly They’re different
- dataflow 4mo agoI'm confused; did you reply on the wrong thread, or am I misunderstanding something? I was merely suggesting it'd be good to mention Boost on your website and how well it works with Fil-C. This suggestion was not specifically regarding anything called assembly; it was just a general comment. I merely mentioned it because you were here.
- pizlonator 4mo agoOoh - I thought you meant adding boosts use of assembly to the list of inline asm use cases I get you now