3 ms·
For rich link previews, OpenGraph[0] is much more often supported than JSON-LD. For seo purpose, the kind of JSON-LD a search engine will support is very speci
by ghssds 3mo ago
For rich link previews, OpenGraph[0] is much more often supported than JSON-LD.
For seo purpose, the kind of JSON-LD a search engine will support is very specific and limited. You are far better consulting the targetted search engine's documentation (Google[1], Bing[2]) and following that. Anything else is a waste of time.
Outside of search engines, again, without a specific purpose, JSON-LD is mostly useless. If you have a specific need that requires JSON-LD, go ahead and include the data you know will be useful. Including anything else is like shouting into the void.
IndieWeb[3] does use structured data but considers JSON-LD a DRY violation and uses Microformats[4] instead.
0: https://ogp.me https://ogp.me
1: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/structured-data/intro-structured-data https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/structu...
2: https://www.bing.com/webmasters/help/marking-up-your-site-with-structured-data-3a93e731 https://www.bing.com/webmasters/help/marking-up-your-site-wi...
3: https://indieweb.org/ https://indieweb.org/
4: https://microformats.org/ https://microformats.org/
- zwu-var 3mo agoThis is exactly my gripe with such structured web standards! There are just way too many for me to bother with, and none of them has good support.