4 ms·
Their usual stance is something along the lines of their company is creating AI correctly--not that AI will inherently destroy humanity--and that them working t
by scarmig 4mo ago
Their usual stance is something along the lines of their company is creating AI correctly--not that AI will inherently destroy humanity--and that them working there helps that end. It's extremely reasonable to question their approach, but here you've jumped from "NFT crypto bros trying to run a scam" to "monsters excited to annihilate the human race," which is a wild leap, and betrays a point of view that seems more driven by anti-AI psychosis than consideration of any evidence.
- dodu_ 4mo ago[flagged]
- scarmig 4mo ago> This would be a great point if I had introduced either the NFT/crypto comparison OR the "existential threat" parameters, but if you read through the thread, you introduced both. To quote you, ten minutes before: > that the apocalypse is coming and your jobs are gone and everything is going to be shitty because a bunch of ultra rich midwits want even more money and there's nothing you can do to stop it. It's a fair description of your stance. And, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
- dodu_ 4mo ago[flagged]