4 ms·
But if someone doesn't need a big budget it makes sense to decrease it. It reduces efficiency if you force yourself to spend the whole budget.
by charcircuit 4mo ago
But if someone doesn't need a big budget it makes sense to decrease it. It reduces efficiency if you force yourself to spend the whole budget.
- yCombLinks 4mo agoBut what if you need to save up to buy something that you can't afford in one year? Or you're trying to reduce cost in one place enough to hire a team to do some other project?
- charcircuit 4mo agoThen you can argue why you still need the budget. It May make sense to temporarily allocate a bigger budget immediately to do those things instead of delaying, trying to save.
- idiotsecant 4mo agoCongratulations. Your budget is now permanently smaller because your appeals are completely irrelevant to the machine and you get to do less. Forever. Maybe you have to fire some people.
- charcircuit 4mo agoIf you don't need a big budget then yes you should continue onwards with a smaller budget. That's not a surprising conclusion.
- IIsi50MHz 4mo agoI believe the intended meaning was "Now, regardless of any future considerations, your budget is permanently smaller.".
- christophilus 4mo agoYou buy it with financing in that case. And you fit your reductions and hires into the same fiscal year.