3 ms·
> given how low the base rate is, the reduction in number of procedures (and the resulting negative impacts on the women) would be incredibly low Correct. Thes
by JumpCrisscross 5mo ago
> given how low the base rate is, the reduction in number of procedures (and the resulting negative impacts on the women) would be incredibly low
Correct. These data are more a preview of what we can expect to see as the vaccinated cohort (in countries that aren’t pro-disease) advances in age.
- toomuchtodo 5mo agoIndeed, Australia will be one of the first countries to eliminate cervical cancer (by 2035) due to their HPV vaccine vaccination uptake rates. Two decades to get here, one to go. https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-rebecca-white-mp/media/australia-on-track-to-eliminate-cervical-cancer-by-2035 https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-rebecca-white-mp... https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13036706/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13036706/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098299725000871 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009829972... https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd6w15vgp7lo https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd6w15vgp7lo
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]