3 ms·
Exactly. You've said it yourself - you cannot rely on the results to tell if a language is faster than another. That was the original context of my claim, and y
by pbiggar 14y ago
Exactly. You've said it yourself - you cannot rely on the results to tell if a language is faster than another. That was the original context of my claim, and you are admitting it yourself.
- igouy 14y agoI said - "You can rely on the results." Please say what you mean by "a language is faster than another". Please say what in The Java™ Language Specification tells us that "language is faster than another." http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/index.html http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/index.html
- pbiggar 14y agoExactly. You can't use the results to say that one language is faster than another. It doesn't even make sense. (That's the context of the conversation, see http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4851781 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4851781)
- igouy 14y ago>> You can't use the results to say that... << That's a different claim. >> It doesn't even make sense << That depends on what `notJim` meant by "to compare speeds of programming languages". `notJim` might have thought that everyone would understand he was talking about particular language implementations and particular tasks and particular programs.