One interesting way to reframe the whole thing is to ask: "What would happen if we burned all known fossil fuel reserves?" The results would be truly catastro

One interesting way to reframe the whole thing is to ask: "What would happen if we burned all known fossil fuel reserves?" The results would be truly catastrophic. This framing leads one to understand that carbon-based fuel must end, no ifs ands or buts. I feel like that should be the question asked, as the answer is far clearer than a 1C vs 2C debate.