3 ms·
Right. And what I'm saying is I refuse to believe the Linux kernel approval procedures are that inefficient. Therefore, your belief "bottleneck was most likel
by qarl 4mo ago
Right.
And what I'm saying is I refuse to believe the Linux kernel approval procedures are that inefficient. Therefore, your belief "bottleneck was most likely not mechanical code changes" is most likely incorrect.
It would be interesting to get the actual answer to this question.
EDIT: Substantially changing your argument after posting isn't nice. But to answer your charge - no - I never made that claim.
- qustio 4mo agoSorry, I didn't feel like this thread needed to be dragged out any longer since it's going in circles at this point and expanded my comment, but I didn't realize you had already replied.
- qarl 4mo agoWell - not really a circle. I keep saying the same thing over and over and you keep throwing arguments at it, unsuccessfully.
- NetMageSCW 4mo agoI don’t think it’s the arguments that are unsuccessful.
- qarl 4mo agoIf you have an actual criticism of my argument you'll need to be more clear to be understood.