3 ms·
> 1) I’ve put enough kms on FSD to know that it isn’t going to drive into a house. Is it possible FSD on this vehicle was a different version? Can't FSD change
by paulryanrogers 4mo ago
> 1) I’ve put enough kms on FSD to know that it isn’t going to drive into a house.
Is it possible FSD on this vehicle was a different version? Can't FSD change from one drive to the next, based on software updates or even external conditions?
Perhaps you drove in a different region with differing conditions?
> 3) Regardless of who was controlling it, why did this guy let his car jump the kerb and go through a house? Why was he going fast enough?
Why is it called "Full Self Driving" if the person behind the wheel must control (or even just monitor) the speed?
- aetherspawn 4mo agoThat’s exactly the thing. We’re on FSD 13 and America is on FSD 14, we’re always about a year behind. Yours is significantly better than ours (being RHD market), but ours still wouldn’t drive through a house.
- erentz 4mo agoYou’re extremely confident about this just based on your experience of it not happening to you. It’s good that it hasn’t driven you into a house but that doesn’t mean it can’t fail in a way that does drive someone else into a house.
- aetherspawn 4mo agoWell, I’ve seen it very confidently and correctly navigate rural unmarked roads, and drive around rocks and logs across the road and things like this. I find it hard to believe it would drive through a huge stationary object like a house, which I imagine is definitely in the training data. I guess I’m not saying it’s impossible, but I think at this stage it’s improbable.
- jcgrillo 4mo agoThe computer does not see things like you see things ;)
- budsniffer952 4mo agoThe fact that you are saying "but houses are in the training data!" demonstrates your naivete. Do you think there's some magic going on here?
- IncreasePosts 4mo agoI believe how good your FSD is also depends on how new your Tesla is because older ones are underpowered and maybe use an underpowered vision model
- FireBeyond 4mo ago> Perhaps you drove in a different region with differing conditions? Agreed. He's driven it "across Australia". Which means long straight highways for hundreds and hundreds of miles at a time (then recharge, then do long straight highway for hundreds and hundreds of miles), and often fairly lightly trafficked: https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Perth,+Western+Australia,+Australia/Adelaide,+South+Australia,+Australia/@-31.6951325,125.9680373,766662m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m14!4m13!1m5!1m1!1s0x2a32966cdb47733d:0x304f0b535df55d0!2m2!1d115.8616783!2d-31.9513993!1m5!1m1!1s0x6ab735c7c526b33f:0x4033654628ec640!2m2!1d138.6007456!2d-34.9284989!3e0?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDYxNi4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Perth,+Western+Australia,+Au... Like... absolutely shocking that FSD performs decently on well maintained, largely straight highway in generally clear desert conditions. Surely this is indicative of its behavior everywhere else! /s
- aetherspawn 4mo agoHaha. Driving through Sydney is way worse than Los Angeles. We don’t all live out in the sticks with snakes in our boots.
- FireBeyond 4mo agoI would agree, and know well, though I lived in Melbourne for two decades. But still, "driving across Australia" doesn't involve a lot of time spent in the Sydney (or Melbourne) CBDs.