3 ms·
Still, apparently Amsterdam somehow doesn't satisfy the 30% criterion at all. Can anyone find detailed numbers? I live there and my street is lined with large t
by gpvos 4mo ago
Still, apparently Amsterdam somehow doesn't satisfy the 30% criterion at all. Can anyone find detailed numbers? I live there and my street is lined with large trees.
- ricardobeat 4mo agoWas thinking the same. There must be some glitch in how this is calculated, as we definitely have >30% tree coverage in every city. Maybe the vast areas of shrub-filled countryside and farmland are skewing the data.
- maxldn 4mo agoNot sure. 30% sounds like a lot. The streets in central Amsterdam _might_ have 30% cover if you don’t count the water, but what about the houses, gardens, etc?
- gpvos 4mo agoTrue, but then I wonder how other cities get that high without essentially being a park with a few buildings dotted here and there.
- Windchaser 4mo agotrees over roads, parking lots, etc. But then, as you scale towards higher density (e.g., replacing parking lots with garages), you end up with less space for trees. Unless you put them on top of buildings, ofc.
- Nnnes 4mo agoThis is the dataset they used: https://land.copernicus.eu/en/products/high-resolution-layer-forests-and-tree-cover/tree-cover-density-2018-present-raster-100-m-europe-yearly https://land.copernicus.eu/en/products/high-resolution-layer...