3 ms·
[flagged]
by codemog 3mo ago
[flagged]
- girvo 3mo ago> And when corporate needs to lay off 30% they’ll think nothing of it. Having seen this literally play out this year: it was all of the C’s that were first to be cut shrug
- codemog 3mo ago> Typical Kent, trying to do the right thing, regardless of the cost. Unfortunately, this time the cost was him losing his job. Well Kent got fired from Facebook, so maybe he wasn’t such an A player in their eyes. ;)
- AlexeyBelov 3mo agoIn a couple of companies I'm familiar with the cuts weren't based on performance in any discernable way.
- projektfu 3mo agoIf I hired a full time programmer and found out they had two other jobs I'd probably let them focus on those other two. If they were showing the "C" behaviors in all three jobs, they have no job security, unless they work where they can't be let go.
- ponector 3mo agoShouldn't you measure output instead of hours spent on the job? People could be productive or not with one job as well as there.
- projektfu 3mo agoLOL
- feoren 3mo agoMeasuring output is what this whole post is about. 1. "If you have poor output, you won't last long. Here's what 'poor output' looks like..." 2. "But what if they have poor output because they're working three jobs?" 3. "Then I'd let them go." You: "Cruel! Shouldn't you be measuring their output!?"
- lokar 3mo agoIME many people are in it for the love of the game. They want to get better, they want to be able to perform the “magic” the Sr people come up with. It’s fun.
- dang 3mo agoPlease omit swipes, not to mention slurs, from your comments here. This is in the site guidelines: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html. "Edit out swipes." "When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. 'That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3' can be shortened to '1 + 1 is 2, not 3."