4 ms·
Only if you're fine with disenfranchising voters. In which case, securing elections is the easiest thing in the world: I vote and nobody else does. It's securin
by post-it 4mo ago
Only if you're fine with disenfranchising voters. In which case, securing elections is the easiest thing in the world: I vote and nobody else does. It's securing elections while not disenfranchising voters that's the hard part.
- Bender 4mo agoWe should make a new thread for voting challenges.
- bluefirebrand 4mo ago> Only if you're fine with disenfranchising voters I don't love disenfranchising voters but I think it's probably better than allowing elections to be vulnerable to foreign tampering, don't you think?
- 0x00C0FFEE 4mo agoThat’s a false dichotomy. Better practices for election security can be implemented without disenfranchising voters.
- DaSHacka 4mo agoDisenfranchising the entire populace by nature of ID verification to use the internet naturally includes voters as well.
- razakel 4mo agoThe foreign tampering wasn't at the ballot box.
- inigyou 4mo agoSocial media also lets foreign agents tamper elections.