3 ms·
Can agree on that. The description of the paper also said: AI users who maintain similar homework completion time as non-AI users experience small learning lo
by sisve 4mo ago
Can agree on that.
The description of the paper also said:
AI users who maintain similar homework completion time as non-AI users experience small learning losses.
This was a surprise too me. I would have thought otherwise.
Would love to see some evidence about if more or less people fall behind and have worse results. In my head the AI should be able to get the weakest students a bit highere.
- JumpCrisscross 4mo ago> In my head the AI should be able to get the weakest students a bit higher I think the evidence so far is all students lose learning and cognition, but the brighter students lose less.
- sisve 3mo agoBased on the paper it hits harder on the brighter From https://cepr.org/publications/dp21577 https://cepr.org/publications/dp21577 : The losses are largest in social science subjects, followed by STEM and languages, and are especially large for junior students, high-achieving students, and boys. No mention of the weakest student. Which probably means they did not have a significant worse or better score