> Admittedly unpleasant if it means there can't be any grocery store or even café reachable by foot, but at least I get the rationale. I dont get the rationale

> Admittedly unpleasant if it means there can't be any grocery store or even café reachable by foot, but at least I get the rationale. I dont get the rationale with those two. What it is, to make living less comforta ble for residents? Doesnt everybody wants a grocery store and cafe nearby?