Or is cialis playing the long game? I kid, I kid. I personally don't buy google ads because I think they are overpriced; google does too good of a job advert

Or is cialis playing the long game? I kid, I kid. I personally don't buy google ads because I think they are overpriced; google does too good of a job advertising their ad service. But I certainly acknowledge that they have made ads much more efficient, for people buying and selling ads. But, really? I think for the consumer? irrelevant ads are probably healthier than relevant ads. Being subject to your vendor's reality distortion field is not in your best interest. As much as possible, you want your filter bubble to exclude media created by your vendor. (The really interesting case, I think, where you can argue that I am wrong is cisco and microsoft. Both publish some really excellent technical books; I mean, to the point where the excellent technical books become a rational reason for buying cisco kit- Probably the closest one can come to the advertising being good for the consumer. Of course, the books aren't free, and the premium for cisco kit is... substantial.)