2 ms·
Have you read the article? > that’s not a developer contributing to open source. that’s someone manufacturing the appearance of activity. > the attacker’s own
by KolmogorovComp 4mo ago
Have you read the article?
> that’s not a developer contributing to open source. that’s someone manufacturing the appearance of activity.
> the attacker’s own profile? no bio, no avatar, 499 contributions crammed into january–february 2026.
> this wasn’t random
> i reported the repo to github. the ticket is open. but this raises a question i keep coming back to
- theorchid 4mo agoThanks. I checked the text using the gptzero service. It shows that 100% of the text was generated by AI. I removed the link from my article. I checked out the other pages on his website. And his other articles. AI-generated content is absolutely everywhere. Oh, I'm so tired of AI-generated texts.