2 ms·
I believe it's most directly a response to this op-ed making the rounds recently: http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2012/nov/30/moma-vide
by mjn 14y ago
I believe it's most directly a response to this op-ed making the rounds recently: http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2012/nov/30/moma-video-games-art http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/201...
The "[x] isn't art" op-ed seems to be that particular Guardian blogger's specialty. Last year, he caused a flurry of outraged discussion in a different set of communities for roughly similar reasons, when he wrote an op-ed on why neither cuisine nor high fashion are art: http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2011/apr/21/food-fashion-art-cuisine-couture http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/201...
- soljin2000 14y agoJesus this Johnathan Jones piece is pure flame bait pure and simple. I don't even believe he believes it. Doesn't even need a response.