4 ms·
"This Web site requires a more modern browser to operate securely; please upgrade your browser." Alternative, no SNI required https://web.archive.org/web/2026
by 1vuio0pswjnm7 4mo ago
"This Web site requires a more modern browser to operate securely; please upgrade your browser."
Alternative, no SNI required
https://web.archive.org/web/20260619061625if_/https://mnot.net/blog/2026/well_known_uris https://web.archive.org/web/20260619061625if_/https://mnot.n...
- xyzzy_plugh 4mo agoSNI is good, though? I'm curious how you are running into this.
- quotemstr 4mo agoPerhaps he's trying to drive adoption of ECH. SNI is better than nothing, but it leaves the name of the destination domain in plaintext.
- deleted 4mo ago[deleted]
- 1vuio0pswjnm7 4mo agoIf one is conducting surveillance and/or censorship of www users, SNI is not good It's great
- 1vuio0pswjnm7 4mo agoInternet Draft: ECH Considered Harmful https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-stein-tls-ech-considered-harmful-00.html https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-stein-tls-ech-consider...