4 ms·
Why don't you try to stop preemptively dismissing other people. Calling it "immoral" doesn't mean anything unless you define morality and that's a loaded gun. T
by drivebyacct2 14y ago
Why don't you try to stop preemptively dismissing other people. Calling it "immoral" doesn't mean anything unless you define morality and that's a loaded gun. The point is that legally, there is a distinction between depriving others of property and infringing on a copyright.
If they're different crimes, they're treated differently, addressed differently, etc... how on Earth is it not relevant to discuss?
- robryan 14y agoDo we need to define them as moral or immoral though? They are different crimes but both crimes currently.
- demetrius 14y agoCrime is something defined by law. Law can get wrong, and very often does. I live in a country where it’s forbidden to organise people to jog in the park together via social network (unless you get appropriate permission, lol). Is such a 'crime' immoral? If you think your country’s laws are always correct, think again. There are even cases when what has been considered a crime now is considered a bravery. For example, Lithuanian book smugglers were commiting a crime, but now they are considered to have been doing the right thing.