No? I don't see where you addressed these points in context? I am saying that I don't find what you're saying to be at all convincing but am of course open to r

No? I don't see where you addressed these points in context? I am saying that I don't find what you're saying to be at all convincing but am of course open to reasoned debate if you think I've got something wrong. Being concerned about the scenario I outlined above truly seems absurd to me. Do you see an obvious issue with the sequence of events I posed?