2 ms·
That reply is wrong on so many levels. First of all, everyone wants the benefits of HTTP/2.0, obviously. Else I'd be using gopher, thank you very much. Then,
by zobzu 14y ago
That reply is wrong on so many levels.
First of all, everyone wants the benefits of HTTP/2.0, obviously. Else I'd be using gopher, thank you very much.
Then, startssl is a company, that happens to give free certs. For one single sub-domain. Got two subdomains? Gotta pay.
They can also decide to make those non-free at any given moment, if they feel like it.
The only part I agree with, is paying for EV certificates. But you should NOT need to pay and you should NOT need a third party to be responsible for YOUR certificates if you do not want to.
And again, there's quite a few distributed trust models around that work well and do exactly that, but get great push back from vendors, since, by nature, they don't bring as much money back.