4 ms·

I’d argue that it still makes a difference because the language can determine what kinds of issues are possible to occur, as well as the quality and availabilit

by dabinat 4mo ago

I’d argue that it still makes a difference because the language can determine what kinds of issues are possible to occur, as well as the quality and availability of training data from that language. Rust is a good language for AI because it gives the agent immediate feedback if something is wrong. But it may be the case that AI-specific languages and higher abstractions evolve and in future we may just be managing a series of prompts that generate code on the fly at compile time.

naivehacker 4mo ago
> But it may be the case that AI-specific languages and higher abstractions evolve and in future we may just be managing a series of prompts that generate code on the fly at compile time. I am glad to this idea but I think it won't be natural languages - it may be some kind of Immediate Representation - full of semantic definite tokens.