3 ms·
yes, and hopefully all of them will be set up in his garden and his children kindergarten. Because why somebody else should bear the risk of a nuclear disaste
by julcol 4mo ago
yes, and hopefully all of them will be set up in his garden and his children kindergarten.
Because why somebody else should bear the risk of a nuclear disaster.
This is nonsense. State/society is the last backstop, the last resort insurer in nuclear risk. Why shall we insure nuclear risks so Mark gets richer with more clicks ? again socializing the costs and privatizing de profits.
Not in my backyard.
- nine_k 4mo agoThis kind of reactor is really hard to blow up: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molten-salt_reactor#Properties https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molten-salt_reactor#Properties (Disclaimer: most of my life I lived closer than 50 miles to various major nuclear plants.)
- richwater 4mo agoMaybe you're right. Maybe we should just continue to burn coal and let people die of black lung mining it and millions of people living in the pollution zone. Safe, clean energy is overrated.
- julcol 4mo agoI am not saying I am against nuclear. I am just against "private" nuclear benefits, public insurance. Your answer is off topic and full of prejudice.
- coryrc 4mo agoIf they let me buy the heat for cheap, yes in my backyard. Well, not literally in my back yard, but only because there's a great space several blocks over where there's already lots of freeway noise, so any process noise will be overwhelmed. My city needs tax revenue too, so this would be great.