2 ms·
1. This is bad, if true. 2. In the future, there won't be copyright. Or open source. Or anything "owned". It can all just be copied trivially, and there's lite
by echelon 4mo ago
1. This is bad, if true.
2. In the future, there won't be copyright. Or open source. Or anything "owned". It can all just be copied trivially, and there's literally no stopping it.
3. I don't know how to feel about any of that. This is so new and complicated. The whole world is changing dramatically and being completely reshaped.
- kordlessagain 4mo agoAs Musk and Dorsey have said, IP law is highly incompatible with AI. Wasn't there some news a while ago that Anthropic and other frontier model companies used a bunch of pirated books to train their models? Are we not all benefiting from the fact that they also crawled a bunch of open code repos? If something is open source, it's pretty easy to tell if code is pulled directly from another repo and included in a project. It's much harder to know if whatever model was building something pulled from it (through training or simply searching online).
- theshrike79 4mo ago> Wasn't there some news a while ago that Anthropic and other frontier model companies used a bunch of pirated books to train their models? Are we not all benefiting from the fact that they also crawled a bunch of open code repos? It was Meta. With Zuck's explicit permission.
- Barbing 4mo ago& Anthropic owes $1.5b https://apnews.com/article/anthropic-authors-copyright-judge-artificial-intelligence-9643064e847a5e88ef6ee8b620b3a44c https://apnews.com/article/anthropic-authors-copyright-judge...
- yencabulator 4mo ago> 2. In the future, there won't be copyright. Or open source. Or anything "owned". It can all just be copied trivially, and there's literally no stopping it. Oh, no. Not at all. There won't be copyright for you. Disney will still have theirs, and so will anyone else rich enough.