3 ms·
Well, yes, they should be not-backwards. If you cut funding for helpful science on the basis of ignorant claims, you're acting backwards. If you act backwards,
by Windchaser 4mo ago
Well, yes, they should be not-backwards.
If you cut funding for helpful science on the basis of ignorant claims, you're acting backwards. If you act backwards, you may get called backwards.
You should still change, become not-backwards, and fund science.