3 ms·
Unless you live in North Korea, China, Russia, UK, France, Australia or Ireland it’s still illegal to coerce or force someone to give up their personal keys or
by deno 4mo ago
Unless you live in North Korea, China, Russia, UK, France, Australia or Ireland it’s still illegal to coerce or force someone to give up their personal keys or passwords, so this feature is still useful against some law-bound adversaries in free countries.
- pshirshov 4mo agoWell, I live in Ireland but not sure what you refer to. Something being illegal does not imply it doesn't happen though.
- deno 4mo agolaw in question: https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2017/act/11/section/7/enacted/en/html#sec7 https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2017/act/11/section/7/en... and recent Supreme Court decision that upheld its constitutionality: https://www.algoodbody.com/insights-publications/password-protected-supreme-court-clarifies-boundaries-of-privilege-against-self-incrimination-where-access-to-digital-devices-is-compelled https://www.algoodbody.com/insights-publications/password-pr...
- linkgoron 4mo agoWhat are you trying to prove? He never said you're wrong, just the fact that something is illegal doesn't mean that it won't happen to you, just that it's illegal - those are just words written in a book somewhere. Even so-called law bound adversaries break the law all the time. A cop beating you senseless or breaking into your home is illegal, but it happens all the time. You're welcome to sue after the fact.
- deno 4mo agoThis is not relevant to memory encryption, after all the police could just plant any false evidence. You use video camera/CCTV and other evidence gathering to document such illegal police action. Suing after the fact is a valid strategy and in free countries this would allow you to exclude illegally obtained evidence or evidence lacking proper chain of custody.
- iamnothere 4mo agoIf you sue them they will just beat you with a wrench again. Courts are imaginary. You should stop resisting. /s
- deleted 4mo ago[deleted]
- wang_li 4mo agoIn a previous administration they apparently concluded that while the government can't violate your first amendment free speech rights, they can ask a third party to do so. So what makes you think that the CIA won't hire blackwater or the crips to hit your toes with a ball peen hammer until you tell them what you want to know, and then walk away having not violated your constitutional right to privacy and not incriminate yourself?
- deno 4mo agoI don’t want to get into specifics because ultimately it just comes down to the logical argument that just because a strategy is not by itself successful against all possible threats it doesn’t mean it’s worthless. By this logic you wouldn’t lock your front doors.
- ezconnect 4mo agoThe West just a few years ago declared that at airport entry points, no one is including their citizen is not protected by any law when it comes to providing access to your private stuff.
- deno 4mo agoDon’t bring your sensitive data to airports.