It is an interesting discussion. The article's points about evolution continuing in terms of disease prevention, ability to fight germs, etc. are understandabl

It is an interesting discussion. The article's points about evolution continuing in terms of disease prevention, ability to fight germs, etc. are understandable, as with greater population density, exposure to those things do go up. On the other hand, every time we make a scientific advance which allows people to continue living/reproducing when they wouldn't have before, we lower the selection criteria, and it seems like this would have to slow evolution as a result, right?