4 ms·
That's an interesting point of view. For me, people who advocate for preservation are usually older because they remember the times when you could just buy game
by skotobaza 4mo ago
That's an interesting point of view. For me, people who advocate for preservation are usually older because they remember the times when you could just buy games and they would keep working forever. While younger people were born into the world where online games is the norm so they don't expect everything to last long.
- joxdosba 4mo agoI’m sure the preservation folks will tend to be older, but they’re still going to end up grouped with all other gamers. It’s a deeply unfortunate association. The “gamer” identity is toxic to the point where “gamer word” means “racial slur”.
- probiz 4mo ago[flagged]
- skotobaza 4mo agoI think with younger generations the perception shifted quite a bit. Gaming has become so normal that people with "radical" views and behavior are now in minority. Also the other aspects affected this - livestreaming is a good example where you need to be on your best behavior to not get banned or canceled.
- joxdosba 4mo agoAre you sure? Ask yourself, how are women treated when they join the voice chat?
- skotobaza 4mo agoMore or less sure, but not 100% of course. Women are treated a bit better in my experience compared to say 10 or 15 years ago. Unfortunately, I haven't played many competitive games in the last couple of years, but before that rather than being insulted there were two outcomes: women were either treated normally (well as normal as it can get during heated rounds) or they were being hit on (I witnessed it a couple of times myself). The popularity of streaming also helped a bit since a lot of streamers are women.