3 ms·

Even then, opening two windows require that the wind is blowing and in the right direction. I purchased a box fan just so I can put it in a window to get more

Even then, opening two windows require that the wind is blowing and in the right direction. I purchased a box fan just so I can put it in a window to get more ventilation (and it was to blow out allergens, not temperature control). Best $18 I ever spent. This is someone who is just looking for an excuse to not like the apartment.

fragmede 4mo ago
Are you suggesting that people in Walnut Creek are being dishonest about not liking specific features about housing because they're against housing in general? I'm shocked! Just utterly shocked, I tell you.
- kevinburke 4mo ago
  I don't really like being called dishonest, there's a pretty broad literature showing the potential gains of cross ventilation even with a small amount of wind. It's extremely rare to have a day without wind at even 2mph and even if such a day exists, running your hood or bathroom fan are also extremely effective ways to create a pressure differential and draw air into your house. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1755660/FULLTEXT01.pdf https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1755660/FULLTEXT... "there is a reduction of 90% of hours of a possible use of mechanical ventilation, showing the feasibility to achieve thermal comfort within the house by using passive ventilation" https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306261913008283 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S03062... " Indoor thermal conditions were found to be within the comfort zone for more than 70% of the time under cross ventilation operation while single-sided ventilation provided adequate thermal conditions for only 1% of the time. Results from this study highlight a significantly better performance of cross ventilation over single-sided ventilation." https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378778817307636?via%3Dihub https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S03787...
  - fragmede 4mo ago
    The worst NIMBYs are the ones that have talked themselves into believing their own nonsense. Thankfully the state passed SB 330 builders remedy and extended it too 2030.

fragmede 4mo ago

Are you suggesting that people in Walnut Creek are being dishonest about not liking specific features about housing because they're against housing in general? I'm shocked! Just utterly shocked, I tell you.

kevinburke 4mo ago
I don't really like being called dishonest, there's a pretty broad literature showing the potential gains of cross ventilation even with a small amount of wind. It's extremely rare to have a day without wind at even 2mph and even if such a day exists, running your hood or bathroom fan are also extremely effective ways to create a pressure differential and draw air into your house. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1755660/FULLTEXT01.pdf https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1755660/FULLTEXT... "there is a reduction of 90% of hours of a possible use of mechanical ventilation, showing the feasibility to achieve thermal comfort within the house by using passive ventilation" https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306261913008283 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S03062... " Indoor thermal conditions were found to be within the comfort zone for more than 70% of the time under cross ventilation operation while single-sided ventilation provided adequate thermal conditions for only 1% of the time. Results from this study highlight a significantly better performance of cross ventilation over single-sided ventilation." https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378778817307636?via%3Dihub https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S03787...
- fragmede 4mo ago
  The worst NIMBYs are the ones that have talked themselves into believing their own nonsense. Thankfully the state passed SB 330 builders remedy and extended it too 2030.