4 ms·
Climate change denialist or alarmist is labeling. You belive in something and other don't. Your arrogance to opposite opinion does not bring anything new to di
by t0bia_s 4mo ago
Climate change denialist or alarmist is labeling. You belive in something and other don't.
Your arrogance to opposite opinion does not bring anything new to dialogue.
- tovej 4mo agoYes, it's labeling. One of those labels is very accurate, the other is part of a rhetoric that the oil companies are using to drag out the climate response so that they can keep raking in profits. I'm not here to convince you of climate change. If you're actually dumb enough to deny it, then it's most likely a lost cause. The more likely scenario is that you're a bad faith troll, and then this dialogue shows others a positive example: it's ok to be a dick to climate change deniers.
- t0bia_s 4mo agoI asked a simple question. Your conclusions just proove how religious topic it could be for some. You completely ignorong a point and talk about your dogmatic opinion. Insulting others that not even agree/disagree with your pushed opinion does not makes you right.
- tovej 4mo agoBeing right makes me right. You don't even have a point? Besides a strawman argument about non-existent religious climate alarmists. There's nothing to ignore. I have no reason to give you the benefit of the doubt. You're either a bad faith troll or you're an idiot.