3 ms·
It was the content. So many very specific claims with no source, just stuff being made up. I don't know who Brené Brown is, perhaps she specifically researches
by loopmonster 4mo ago
It was the content. So many very specific claims with no source, just stuff being made up. I don't know who Brené Brown is, perhaps she specifically researches trust, but how curious that her daughter can raise a problem with trust, specifically cite two named behaviours that build trust, and then Brown just happens to have a database of trust-building behaviours to hand, that she hasn't even analysed, ready to output a teachable moment.
- brookst 4mo agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brené_Brown https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brené_Brown I am not sure if you posted a brilliant, subtle joke... or if you're demonstrating the exact behavior that you suggest is a flag of inauthenticity.
- rustyminnow 4mo agoIn the article, she wasn't introduced as a researcher at all, but suddenly "She went back to her research data...". This totally smells like an LLM refactor where it re-emits surface level details, but completely misses the key beats that tie ideas together across a story.
- brookst 4mo agoSo, failure to do research and ensure a coherent mental model leads to erroneous inferences… for humans as well :)
- rustyminnow 3mo agoWhat's your point? Yes, humans and AIs CAN make similar errors. However, continuity and context churn at this level is the sort of error that humans make rarely and AIs make constantly. By itself it is not a sure sign of LLM output, but along with other signals it is highly suggestive.