3 ms·
The article is valid alarm but I would expect more education from "The Hill" to know that it wasn't the chatbot version of Grok, saying that makes the author so
by ck2 4mo ago
The article is valid alarm but I would expect more education from "The Hill" to know that it wasn't the chatbot version of Grok, saying that makes the author sound stupid
- iAMkenough 4mo agoI could see how the government’s “equivalent to 1.5 billion words or 6 million pages of text being processed by the technology” statement could be interpreted as chat.
- cyanydeez 4mo agook, so this comment is just _as_ stupid given there's only two AIs of note being used: image models and LLMs. Neither of them should be trusted with decision making.
- solid_fuel 4mo ago"The concern raised is valid and should cause alarm" BUT "I'm going to ignore it instead because of a disagreement on the terminology used"