3 ms·
Why is it stupid to flag genuinely LLM-written content? It might've been thought out by a human, but the final version is clearly LLM-written or extremely heavi
by Tiberium 4mo ago
Why is it stupid to flag genuinely LLM-written content? It might've been thought out by a human, but the final version is clearly LLM-written or extremely heavily LLM-edited.
- gpvos 4mo agoIt's mostly boring. About 50% of comments of HN are about this at the moment, drowning out actual discussion. If someone writes an interesting article using LLM, I don't mind.
- 0x1d7 4mo agoHN guidelines ask you to not do this. > Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—e.g. article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. They're too common to be interesting. While few read them, it might be helpful if @dang threw in the ", or LLM generated content".
- da_grift_shift 4mo agoHN guidelines also say that HN is for conversation between humans. If we are having a conversation with the author through their article, then the prose should be human too. :^)
- 0x1d7 4mo agoThe 'humans' guidelines are under Comments, not Posts. ;-)