3 ms·
I concur. His tone greatly undermines the value of the facts he reports. Sometimes / oftentimes his analysis is off the mark, but I have not found him to be r
by jgalt212 4mo ago
I concur. His tone greatly undermines the value of the facts he reports. Sometimes / oftentimes his analysis is off the mark, but I have not found him to be reporting falsehoods or inaccuracies.
- simianwords 4mo agoIt’s very very easy to find inaccuracies. In fact it’s hard to find any prediction he got right. Here’s a compilation of things he got wrong. It’s not small things btw https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48447549 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48447549
- jgalt212 4mo agoI don't think reasoning and agentic is an improvement over what came before. It's like going back to batch processing once you've had access to an interactive terminal.
- simianwords 4mo ago> I don't think reasoning and agentic is an improvement over what came before. Respectfully, it shows that you haven't been using agentic models or reasoning models. I would advice you to go and use them and make an opinion afterwards. If you have come to this conclusion after extensively using these models then I don't know what to say. I guess you are the audience for Ed Zitron.
- jgalt212 4mo agoSo the Ed Zitron audience like the REPL and the hypesters like the compiler?