5 ms·
It's also (according to some in Congress) an illegal action as Congress authorized and funded the project: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/lawmakers-fight
by lastofthemojito 4mo ago
It's also (according to some in Congress) an illegal action as Congress authorized and funded the project:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/lawmakers-fight-to-stop-the-trump-administrations-dismantling-of-a-386-million-ocean-observatory-project https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/lawmakers-fight-to-stop...
But that just seems like par for the course for the current administration, whether it's tariffs or ballrooms or ocean sensors - do the illegal thing ASAP, let the courts argue for months or years, and maaaaaybe get a slap on the wrist sometime way in the future.
- autoexec 4mo ago> do the illegal thing ASAP, let the courts argue for months or years, and maaaaaybe get a slap on the wrist sometime way in the future. don't forget that the courts have already decided that anything this president does is legally okay because he's immune from punishment for breaking any law as long as they decide the illegal activity was an "official act".
- deleted 4mo ago[deleted]
- AngryData 4mo agoCongress isn't toothless so I just don't see how I can believe anything but that the majority of congress, whether they claim opposition or not, is onboard with this nonsense. They are completely out of touch and it seems like they are just playing a game of PR hot potato to avoid taking any real action.
- Gud 4mo agoOut of touch with whom? Not with the people who put them there.
- gwerbin 4mo agoWell the majority party in Congress could put a stop to it at any time. The fact that they don't, and haven't just on about any related issue, tells you everything you need to know. They just don't want to put their names on it in case public opinion sours, then they can at least try to keep their jobs and claim innocence.