3 ms·
I think it says more about Metas inability to create new products or make investments. Look at their big growth areas. They acquired instagram and WhatsApp. Th
by throwarayes 4mo ago
I think it says more about Metas inability to create new products or make investments.
Look at their big growth areas. They acquired instagram and WhatsApp. Threads seems successful(?) but is an extension of instagram.
Mostly they’ve just gotten better at weaponizing rage bait. Which I’d argue, long term, will be a losing strategy.
If this were a healthy culture, with all the people working there, Zuck would have promoted far more interesting internal experiment to full blown products. That just doesn’t seem to happen there.
- ribosometronome 4mo ago>Threads ... rage bait The advertisements within Instagram for Threads almost always seem to be fairly thinly disguised engagement & rage bait. Every time it gets me, I feel an increasing desire to move away from the whole ecosystem.
- embedding-shape 4mo ago> Zuck would have promoted far more interesting internal experiment to full blown products. That just doesn’t seem to happen there I don't understand this either, there are so many clearly advantageous ideas and experiments to be be carried out, that can make discussions better, thinking clearer and help people actually connect. But instead they're only thinking about how to optimize the ad-machine in the end, so depressing to see.
- aantix 4mo agoNever understood why Facebook hasn't implemented the 'Explain this post' type feature that you see on X (@grok). Facebook seems to be the most misinformed audience - an LLM fact checker would be a great addition.
- butlike 4mo agoThe scales are different. FB has far and away more users. Could you imagine the headlines? "AI tool now thought police for articles on Facebook"