3 ms·
Not OP, but I generally agree. Models are powerful enough now to reliably instruct other models. They don’t need fancy tools or IDEs, just the command line. Wi
by jw1224 4mo ago
Not OP, but I generally agree. Models are powerful enough now to reliably instruct other models. They don’t need fancy tools or IDEs, just the command line.
With deterministic workflows, type-safe languages and test suites, agentic loops pretty much “can’t fail”. They will continue until the types resolve, the tests pass, and the project requirements are deterministically met.
By that point it’s literally just a case of typing a prompt in to a text field, and waiting.
- ChrisLTD 4mo ago"project requirements are deterministically met" makes it sound so easy
- sanderjd 4mo agoThis seems true to me in theory, but not in practice.
- hypfer 4mo ago[dead]
- z3t4 3mo agoIt works great in dynamic languages as well. Static typing is mostly to aid the IDE. In dynamic languages you can infer the type by looking at the code, and LLM are good at that.