3 ms·
It's not "simple vengeance". It's deterrence. If you don't punish assassins, assassinations will increase in expectation.
by cubefox 4mo ago
It's not "simple vengeance". It's deterrence. If you don't punish assassins, assassinations will increase in expectation.
- FpUser 4mo agoBullshit. Who says anything about punishment. They are being punished, then there MAY come a choice. If you are so hell bent on "deterrence" look after presidential pardons. And if you do not save your own spies given a chance, the next one you want to hire will direct you straight to the place where the sun does not shine
- cubefox 4mo ago> If you are so hell bent on "deterrence" look after presidential pardons. Yes, those create awful incentives and should absolutely not be legal. > And if you do not save your own spies given a chance One should not exchange spies for the cost of increasing political assasinations. Same reason as why you shouldn't pay kidnappers.
- cindyllm 4mo ago[dead]
- FpUser 4mo ago>"One should not exchange spies for the cost of increasing political assasinations. Same reason as why you shouldn't pay kidnappers." I strongly disagree for it to be used as a general approach for either spies or kidnappers. And who says it is exactly the cost? It is all coulda shoulda woulda and depends upon the particular situation.
- tim333 4mo agoThere are other ways you can deter though. Like actions against the government responsible rather than the individual.