3 ms·

Yeah, I think calling the Mv3 versions "secure adblockers" would be more accurate.

• WesolyKubeczek 4mo ago
  Secure for whom?
  • spankalee 4mo ago
    Browser users. Pre Mv3 extensions were a huge vector for malware. My in-laws were hit by that.
    • jdiff 4mo ago
      You can write malicious MV3 extensions. The changes' stated reason was performance, not security.
• curt15 4mo ago
  How about "nerfed adblockers"? Do any of the MV3 versions replicate the full power of ublock origin on Firefox? (https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-best-on-Firefox https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b...)
• pluralmonad 4mo ago
  To keep with the current parlance, "safe adblocker" would seem to fit better. Safe for whom, I think we all already know.