23 ms·
That's not accurate, see https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/xE2HzcHWPFS9EsJqN/radiology-automation-does-not-generalize-to-other-jobs https://www.lesswrong.com/post
by cubefox 4mo ago
That's not accurate, see https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/xE2HzcHWPFS9EsJqN/radiology-automation-does-not-generalize-to-other-jobs https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/xE2HzcHWPFS9EsJqN/radiology-...
- leoc 4mo agoHe seems pretty unequivocal in the video: https://youtu.be/2HMPRXstSvQ https://youtu.be/2HMPRXstSvQ . He even points out that it’s something which he’s claimed previously, ruling out the idea that it was some kind of spur-of-the-moment conclusion.
- cubefox 4mo agoPerhaps, but as the other article points out, the human requirement in radiology has a lot to do with legal and insurance requirements. This is similar to how a lawyer may not be better than an AI but the job is still exclusive to humans.
- root_axis 4mo agoYes, Hinton's prediction was inaccurate.