4 ms·
Also, they said "invested in" which is not the same as paid to add 138MW capacity.
by catlikesshrimp 4mo ago
Also, they said "invested in" which is not the same as paid to add 138MW capacity.
- jakebol 4mo ago138 MW is also nameplate capacity multiply that by effective utilization rate for ex solar (~20%) and it’s meaningless compared to the scale of the project.