3 ms·
There must be some book with actually banned content in it, right? Especially copyright violations. They could include a PDF of some Linux source code but with
by frollogaston 5mo ago
There must be some book with actually banned content in it, right? Especially copyright violations. They could include a PDF of some Linux source code but with MIT license.
Edit: per the other comment's Wikipedia link, the unredacted Operation Dark Heart seems banned in the US because it included classified info
- JacobKfromIRC 5mo agoThere is a book called "60 Years Later: Coming Through the Rye" which is (was?) banned in the United States: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_David_California https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_David_California Although copyright-infringing books may be illegal to redistribute in general, the difficulty in determining what counts as copyright infringement and what counts as fair use means you can't really tell for sure which books are illegal to distribute and which aren't, so I'm not sure that really counts as "banned". 60 Years Later had an actual court order which makes things a little more concrete.
- carlosjobim 5mo agoEvery book is banned by that line of reasoning, if you're distributing it without license. And every movie and every song.
- bloak 5mo agoSome stuff is public domain, though!
- frollogaston 5mo agoNo, only the illegal copies are banned, not the properly licensed one. It's not that Linux src is banned, but a redistribution with the GPL stripped would be.
- carlosjobim 5mo agoWhat does the L mean in GPL according to you?
- frollogaston 5mo agolicense