2 ms·
If that's good long-term for the people in SF who've already invested their time and money there, shouldn't be any other way. It's also not some zero-sum game w
by frollogaston 5mo ago
If that's good long-term for the people in SF who've already invested their time and money there, shouldn't be any other way. It's also not some zero-sum game where voting against development always benefits them at the cost of others; sometimes they want development.
- satvikpendem 5mo agoIt's not good long term for them though, as housing disparity statistically correlates to higher crime.
- frollogaston 5mo agoMaybe more development wouldn't have caused lower crime in SF, we won't know. And that's also not the only thing they care about.