3 ms·
Seems like a lot of machinery over-and-above running the same review n times + aggregating the result. What led you to the design?
by kristjansson 4mo ago
Seems like a lot of machinery over-and-above running the same review n times + aggregating the result. What led you to the design?
- all2 4mo agoThe idea is pretty simple, identity drives focus and outcomes of each of the 'agents'. The review/rebuttal stage filters stuff that likely doesn't matter in the grand scheme (you'll find reviewers get pedantic and take hard lines on things that ultimately don't matter very much). This is based on earlier work from late '25 where people were doing similar things. My added bit is the 'unique identities'. What I found was that the root agent typically picks identities relevant to the project, and so you get relevant 'data' or 'views' from a variety of angles.