3 ms·
I’m so confused. The top fusion is Fable 5 and GPT 5.5. That is not an “ensemble of weaker AI models.”
by JumpCrisscross 5mo ago
I’m so confused. The top fusion is Fable 5 and GPT 5.5. That is not an “ensemble of weaker AI models.”
- tim-star 5mo agoi guess the point is that any fusion is better than any single model and a fusion of the top two models is obviously the best? for cost though i guess you could just duct tape together 10 open source models and then thats comparable?
- JumpCrisscross 5mo ago> though i guess you could just duct tape together 10 open source models and then thats comparable? This is what I was hoping to see data for.
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]
- maniacwhat 5mo agoWhat its saying is if you look at any single model, it can be beaten by an ensemble of weaker models. E.g fable 5 is beaten by an ensemble of previous gen models.
- JumpCrisscross 5mo agoI guess so. 4.8 + 4.8 > Fable 5 is interesting, though not particularly game changing. (The others all fuse frontier models. Which is an argument for using those frontier models more. Not less.)
- pants2 5mo agoYeah, all that's really saying is a weaker model with a better harness can beat a stronger model with a worse harness, specifically on the DRACO benchmark This isn't really a surprising result. Needs more evidence to make a broader claim.