3 ms·
Have you measured your electricity consumption for this rig? I have to wonder how much it would cost you per month.
by leptons 4mo ago
Have you measured your electricity consumption for this rig? I have to wonder how much it would cost you per month.
- ux266478 4mo agoNot nearly as much as you might think. 1.2kw where I live translates to about $0.12/hr, and that's when running full clip. If you have a decent solar hookup, it's small fraction on a sunny day. The expensive part is the upfront hardware cost and the electrical system upgrade you'll need to give your house.
- leptons 4mo agoI'm paying about $0.19/hr and using half that power just for a large spinning RAID, running some VMs and security cameras. And I'm reconsidering my digital extravagance because of the electric bill. You probably make way more money than I do.
- mtone 4mo agoHere's a DeepSeek-V4-Flash benchmark on 2X RTX Pro 6000: - Prefill: ~10K tok/s - Decode: 190 | 375 | 980 tok/s (for 1 | 4 | 16 concurrent requests) - GPU power draw during benchmark: Average: 585W | Max: 849W | Limit: 1200W with undervolt. Idle PC is 125W. I've asked it to calculate the following considering a realistic blend of cached prompts and decode for agentic dev scenario. Electricity-only (@ USD $0.08/kWh) Usage | IN price | OUT price | Monthly cost Concurrency=1 | $0.040/M | $0.080/M | $8.65 to $38.88 (5% to 100% active) Concurrency=4 | $0.024/M | $0.044/M | up to $48.67 (cheaper per token but higher power draw) Total cost of ownership over 3 years is electricity + USD $20K (pre-hike pricing). In a production scenario, how much would I have to charge my users to break even, aiming for 4 concurrent requests 24/7? A) Breakeven API pricing (est. 2B IN + 1B OUT throughput/month): IN price OUT price Self-hosted $0.121/M $0.363/M OpenRouter (budget) $0.098/M $0.196/M OpenRouter (DeepSeek) $0.140/M $0.280/M B) Breakeven subscription (users active ~1.5h/day): 1 user: $563/mo (oh, hai) 25 users: $23/mo 100 users: $6/mo
- arjie 4mo agoVouched your comment. Very cool. What are you running on to get 190 tok/s? I get 400 tok/s at c=4 but c=1 is slower than you.
- CamperBob2 4mo agoNot OP, but I am seeing up to 260 tokens/second output at c=1 with the recipe at https://github.com/local-inference-lab/rtx6kpro/blob/master/models/ds4-flash-v4.md https://github.com/local-inference-lab/rtx6kpro/blob/master/... using 4x 6k cards. Average is more like 200. There may be a way to get the 2-bit quantized version running even faster on a pair of them.
- arjie 4mo agoThank you. Useful to know. Clipped on top by reduce, I assume.
- CamperBob2 4mo agoI think so. The machine I'm using runs at Gen4 x8, while the cards can take advantage of Gen5 x16.
- mtone 4mo agoI am using the `voipmonitor/vllm:lucifer` docker from the RTX6K discord community discussed at the same link the other commenter posted. It is based around this PR https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/43477 https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/43477
- arjie 4mo agoAh I’m on the same PR just behind. Thank you.
- antirez 4mo agoInterestingly if we assume 16 concurrent users, prefill drops to 600 t/s and generation to 61 t/s, and this starts to be dangerously near to M5 Max 35 t/s generation and 400 t/s prefill you get with DwarfStar in your own laptop (that you use for many other things) that costs ~6500 usd/eur.