3 ms·
That's a silly statement. There's been plenty of people who went on there to try to talk sense into him.
by boxed 4mo ago
That's a silly statement. There's been plenty of people who went on there to try to talk sense into him.
- pengaru 4mo agoRogan is obviously pro psychedelics, and was even featured in the oval office during the recent Ibogaine approval signing. I think it's worth noting if this N=1 "study" has any association with such an obviously biased and influential individual.
- boxed 4mo agoI mean.. I've seen the preliminary studies on treatment resistent PTSD so I'm also pro psychedelics, because I'm anti suicide. Dismissing this "study" (really a case file) because of the N=1 and the shady journal seems like a stronger position than bringing in Rogan. Talking about Rogan just looks like partisan posturing.