3 ms·
My bad, the licence is not violated. However, the documentation clearly says that the software must not be used by LLM agents. > the most equivalent is putting
by xigoi 4mo ago
My bad, the licence is not violated. However, the documentation clearly says that the software must not be used by LLM agents.
> the most equivalent is putting a bomb in a package on your porch in order to target people who steal packages. Which is illegal pretty much everywhere.
More like putting a sign on the package saying “If you stole this package, please kill yourself”. If someone steals the package and kills themself, it’s on them.
> just because someone wrongs you does not give you the right to wrong them in turn.
The author of the library did not do anything wrong. The users of the library deliberately allowed their LLM agent to delete the files.
- bawolff 4mo ago> More like putting a sign on the package saying “If you stole this package, please kill yourself”. If someone steals the package and kills themself, it’s on them. Contrary to popular belief, AI's aren't seintient and they don't have agency. They are computer programs. They follow instructions. At the end of the day, its just a machine. If you wrote something on a package that would trigger a machine to kill someone, that is called murder (or at least manslaughter depending on details)