4 ms·
Much the contrary, it showed them that without a nuclear weapon they can be attacked willy-nilly by the USA/Israel, without a nuke it doesn't matter what kind o
by piva00 4mo ago
Much the contrary, it showed them that without a nuclear weapon they can be attacked willy-nilly by the USA/Israel, without a nuke it doesn't matter what kind of agreement or deal they reach it can always be reneged.
Iran looks at North Korea and want that kind of regime stability, at least from outside threats.
- gyanchawdhary 4mo ago[flagged]
- ifyoubuildit 4mo agoTrue or false: they traded a supreme leader who made a religious edict against nuclear weapons for one who did not.
- piva00 4mo agoI think you are in some kind of wishful thinking world. The USA and Israel have killed dozens of leaders, creating a vacuum which is being filled by other radicals just like the ones before. The IRGC is still there, the hardliners are taking more control of the government, I can't picture the state you mention "crushed philosophically and intellectually" at all. Whoever is left to rebuild Iran is going to be from the same fabric that was there before this pointless war, with the added experience of what happens when you don't actually pursue a nuke but use that rhetoric as a bargaining chip. The bargain didn't work, the only way ahead for those hardliners to maintain power in the future (20-50 years) is to acquire a nuclear weapon, otherwise there's nothing that guarantee them that Israel and the USA won't attack again. You think that radical religious zealotry gets "exhausted" like that? They will hold a grudge, and never want to be in that position again.
- gyanchawdhary 4mo ago[dead]