3 ms·
Let's not victim blame here. Would you have called the Indians evil for wanting to have liberty from the british occupiers? What about the many other european c
by za3faran 4mo ago
Let's not victim blame here. Would you have called the Indians evil for wanting to have liberty from the british occupiers? What about the many other european colonies in Asia and Africa, were the locals "evil" for wanting to resist and get liberty?
- cyberax 4mo agoIf they did that by slaughtering civilians? Yes. Absolutely.
- za3faran 4mo agoThe same civilians that are killing them day in and day out?
- cyberax 4mo agoCan the same logic be used to justify the 9/11?
- deleted 4mo ago[deleted]
- za3faran 4mo agoTwo completely different things. Even the UN acknowledges a people's right to resist occupation. 9/11 was condemned by practically all Islamic Scholars.
- cyberax 4mo agoI'm not asking if it was condemned. I'm asking if the same logic can be used to justify 9/11. And you tacitly admitted just that.
- za3faran 4mo agoThe first thing I wrote is that they are two very different things, meaning that no, the same logic cannot be used to justify it. It's quite obvious to say the least.
- cyberax 4mo agoWhy is it different? And how about this: are Jewish people allowed to commit war crimes against Arab colonizers whose stated official goal is Jewish genocide ("from the river to the sea")? If not, then why is it different?